|
POST FOLLOWS: I've been given permission from Marina
Zacharias to post the following
information which appeared in a couple of her newsletters a few years
ago. It can be cross-posted but she has
stipulated that we acknowledge her as
the author. Heartworm - Medication Warning You should be concerned with the ever
increasing evidence that Ivermectin (the
ingredient used in Heartguard) is causing several very drastic changes in dogs.
Dr Jean Dodds, reported at the conference, that it has been linked to fertility problems, thyroid
problems and auto-immune disorders. She
urged us all to get off any form of medication containing this stuff. For heartworm she recommends using only the
'daily' form of medication as it is a
totally different compound. In the 'dirty tricks' department, I received a
fascinating insight into just how
insidious the big drug companies can be.
On Dr Walter A McCall, also participating in the
symposium. The subject of Heartguard did come up and he related his
personal experience regarding how Merck
Pharmaceutical (the manufacturer of
Heart-guard) introduced this
product to the veterinarian community. During Dr McCall's vet. training, the
incidence of heartworm was so little
known, that the school did not have any "live" examples to use
and had to rely on slide
presentations. Consequently, when he
went into practice, he had never
actually seen a heartworm. He knew what
they should look like, but prior to
Merck's marketing efforts, he had simply no occasion in his practice to examine a live specimen. When Heartguard was announced with a heavy
advertising campaign, Merck sent a
"test" kit for the detection of heartworm to every licensed
veterinarian in the Efficient "test kit" you say? Not really.
Turns out that sticking to the
blank slides provided by Merck, there were tiny pieces of plastic
that under normal microscope
magnifications, looked identical to --- you guessed it ? HEARTWORM!! Only when the magnification was jacked way up
could the differences be seen. As far as Dr McCall is concerned, he still
questions the "high risk" area
reports. He is aware of what
seems to be a "pocket" located in the
Sierra's, but so far has seen only one actual case in his practice, with
a dog that had been brought in from the
East coast of Florida. I know in our own area (Pacific Northwest) we
had no reports of heartworm for
years. About two years ago, one case was
confirmed and a major publicity campaign
was mounted (newspaper, TV guide, radio, etc). suddenly most local vets were jumping on the
"cash machine" with Heartguard as the latest "must have" vaccine pumped
into countless animals as a "precaution". I've received many reports of low sperm count
in males and fertility problems in
females that magically disappeared within a few months after taking them off Heartguard. The October 1994 issue of the Mastiff Reporter
carried an interesting article on the
subject by Carol S Bardwick (President of Canine Cryobank Inc).
From 12 years of working/owning a reproductive specialty practice, she relates a variety of cases involving the
deleterious effects of Heartguard and
the return to normal within 60 days of stopping. To quote her "I could go on and on. Scientists and Merck Pharmaceutical would say these incidents are only
"anecdotal". So be it. However, I am
still waiting for Merck to send me any long term repro-ductive studies
on canines on Heartguard. Then I could share those studies with my
clients. Unfortun-ately, Merck has only sent data on rats and mice. I asked if they had ever done any studies at all on
Ivermectin and reproduction in the
canine. "I'll get back to
you" said the Merck veterinarian.
That was in 1992, and I'm still
waiting. (end of article) Before I get into a recent development that
shows great promise, I should mention
that back in March 1993 an article in "Veterinary Forum" pointed out that studies from Cornell University and
the Uni-versity of Pennsylvania
indicated that when Ivermectir or Milbemycin were given to
heartworm Posi- tive dogs at the regular
preventive dose, progressive microfilaria
suppression was demonstrated.
After approximately seven to eight months, most dogs were free of circulating
microfilaria. Evidently this form of treatment is an
"extra-label use" and an informed
consent should be signed by an owner before embarking upon this course. How many vets have ever mentioned this
alternative? Now for the exciting news! An all-breed rescue club in Florida has been
getting astounding results in treating heartworm cases with a homeopathic detoxsode for parasites
called "Paratox". Please understand that these are "rescue"
dogs that were in pretty sad condition
when brought to them. For example, there was a German Shepherd that
was so infested with heartworm that the
attending vet commented that it was the worst case he had ever seen without the dog being
dead! In this particular case, they did a 5 day course of "Clearing"
(another homeopathic remedy made by the
same company) prior to the Paratox treatment. When the dog was rechecked in 6 weeks, the infestation was deemed to be
"very light". They repeated the Paratox treatment and subsequent testing
showed the dog to be "clear"! The treatment is both gentle and simple, easy
to administer and no side effects! In general, for dogs over 25 lbs, 5cc of
Paratox is given orally, once a day for
24 days. One 40 oz bottle supplies a
complete treatment. For smaller dogs,
they have been using 2cc per day for 24 days.
For giant breeds and severely
compromised dogs they have been using double the usual daily dose(ie
10cc for 24 days). What about cost? I'm not sure if you are aware that the
standard "arsenic" treatment
can run well over $1,000.00. The
alternative of using Ivermectin or Milbemycin
is suggested to be for people that suffer from a "thin wallet".
I'm sure you all know the cost of these drugs. Cost of one bottle of Paratox? Are you ready for this : $18.00!! |